With your output of 2 October 2008, I can only disagree with this behavior. Who are you? By what name do you dare to wear these remarks to the media? In your own name? I do not think ... Do you consider your citizens as cons that you can coax good as they seem to you?
I with you, looking back over an interesting fact:
member for Jonquière-Alma, Jean-Pierre Blackburn as Minister of Economic Development Canada for the Regions of Quebec and Minister of Labour voted against:
- Bill C-207: "Bill aims to attract graduates from an institution accredited by region. He wishes to address two problems that affect rural population decline and economic
• exodus of young
• shortage of skilled labor
This non-refundable tax credit of up to $ 8000, can take years. The objective of this measure is to encourage new graduates to locate in designated areas to curb the exodus of young people and accelerate economic development in those regions. "
is the kind of legislation that would have allowed you elected to have a semblance of notes for you entrepreneurs, to have the workforce qualified to Unless you want the cheap labor.
I quote a press release on LBR.ca conservatives: "In the age group 14 to 35 years, slightly less than 950 people have left our region last year. It's much, but it is much less than in 2001 when we attended from 2354 people. Rather than a tax credit ephemeral, these are real jobs that encourage young people to stay here or return to the Saguenay - Lac-Saint-Jean. "I tell you
gentlemen politicians, the problems this statement. First, the fact that the exodus of young people in the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean is declining does not mean it is bad law because it affects not only the region but many parts of Canada, regions rural British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, northern Ontario, Quebec resource regions, sea areas and so on. This law is an incentive that affects many parts of Canada with the problems of migration to urban centers. Then I think to have a tax incentive in addition to having good jobs is a good combination, in any case the 20 000 jobs available in the region will also be filled in other regions of Quebec, since 60 000 jobs will be available in the Quebec City area and 11 000 in the region of the North Shore, these are two examples showing that Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean is not the unique case of retiring baby boomers. For this reason, a non-refundable tax credit is very good as an incentive for peripheral regions like ours.
short, beautiful million lead by Mr. Blackburn of Ottawa are good for the economy of the region, but his behavior People for the future of the region is deplorable. Yet a strong advocate of cuts and tax credits, he refused to vote a credit that encourages skilled workforce in the region. I remind you gentlemen of the "elected" you need to represent the will of your people and not your personal interests. We are not illiterate, October 14 we will make an informed choice with what political parties we have made for a month. So next time you occupy including waste collection, snow removal, or check signing and let us decide what is good for us or not.
I with you, looking back over an interesting fact:
member for Jonquière-Alma, Jean-Pierre Blackburn as Minister of Economic Development Canada for the Regions of Quebec and Minister of Labour voted against:
- Bill C-207: "Bill aims to attract graduates from an institution accredited by region. He wishes to address two problems that affect rural population decline and economic
• exodus of young
• shortage of skilled labor
This non-refundable tax credit of up to $ 8000, can take years. The objective of this measure is to encourage new graduates to locate in designated areas to curb the exodus of young people and accelerate economic development in those regions. "
is the kind of legislation that would have allowed you elected to have a semblance of notes for you entrepreneurs, to have the workforce qualified to Unless you want the cheap labor.
I quote a press release on LBR.ca conservatives: "In the age group 14 to 35 years, slightly less than 950 people have left our region last year. It's much, but it is much less than in 2001 when we attended from 2354 people. Rather than a tax credit ephemeral, these are real jobs that encourage young people to stay here or return to the Saguenay - Lac-Saint-Jean. "I tell you
gentlemen politicians, the problems this statement. First, the fact that the exodus of young people in the Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean is declining does not mean it is bad law because it affects not only the region but many parts of Canada, regions rural British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, northern Ontario, Quebec resource regions, sea areas and so on. This law is an incentive that affects many parts of Canada with the problems of migration to urban centers. Then I think to have a tax incentive in addition to having good jobs is a good combination, in any case the 20 000 jobs available in the region will also be filled in other regions of Quebec, since 60 000 jobs will be available in the Quebec City area and 11 000 in the region of the North Shore, these are two examples showing that Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean is not the unique case of retiring baby boomers. For this reason, a non-refundable tax credit is very good as an incentive for peripheral regions like ours.
short, beautiful million lead by Mr. Blackburn of Ottawa are good for the economy of the region, but his behavior People for the future of the region is deplorable. Yet a strong advocate of cuts and tax credits, he refused to vote a credit that encourages skilled workforce in the region. I remind you gentlemen of the "elected" you need to represent the will of your people and not your personal interests. We are not illiterate, October 14 we will make an informed choice with what political parties we have made for a month. So next time you occupy including waste collection, snow removal, or check signing and let us decide what is good for us or not.
0 comments:
Post a Comment