Election 2008 ... that movements and ideas for every party! The war and the environment, these two issues which the Conservatives are trying not to discuss in public or at least on television and in newspapers. It's time for me to demonstrate irresponsibility and incompetence of the Harper government.
First, Stephen Harper during the election, announced that Canadians had lost confidence in the bedroom. From the beginning, he told us he wanted another minority government. So why dissolve the chamber if it is to ask something that we already have, that is to say a Conservative minority government? The impression I have is this: "Making people believe they risk nothing by voting Conservative because they are minority, so people vote for them in large numbers and by chance, they will be the majority. "
Secondly, the war in Afghanistan, a subject little discussed in the public arena since the beginning of the campaign. I would, for the pleasure of our eyes, we saw what a mission to build schools and hospitals for Stephen Harper. For every dollar invested in humanitarian aid, $ 5 went into military weaponry, according to Radio-Canada. It's 5 against 1, that is the way to help Afghanistan emerge from the hole, pulling to keep it inside. I can not wait to see spending that this war will cost us collectively. Still weird that 100% of Canadians contribute financially to the war, but only a minority of the population agrees with our presence there.
Then, the environment, that is what the Conservatives will lose their elections. After the withdrawal of Canada's Kyoto Protocol and the objectives of achieving paltry Minister Baird, 2050, we must ask questions to different political parties and especially the Conservatives. Did you feel it's far enough to say "We do not care about the environment, 2050 they will get better with that. "And both just close enough to go for people who care about the planet? Especially when we know the means taken now can ensure that we achieve the Kyoto target in less than 5 years! If, for example, we take the 1% GST removed recently and that we put into a fund for the environment that would be used to purchase trees at more than 24 billion trees could be planted as 1% of the GST is 6 billion. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and planting trees this is one of real solutions.
short, the preceding examples of the Conservative party clearly demonstrate the inability of the party to run a country for something as pressing as the environment. The war in Afghanistan is too costly militarily and humanely. Not to mention that Harper wants to regain the minority when it already is. I therefore urge people not to vote Conservative on October 14 because of the inaction, irresponsibility and inability to lead correctly Stephen Harper our great nation, Canada.
Claude Côté, 19, Alma, Quebec
First, Stephen Harper during the election, announced that Canadians had lost confidence in the bedroom. From the beginning, he told us he wanted another minority government. So why dissolve the chamber if it is to ask something that we already have, that is to say a Conservative minority government? The impression I have is this: "Making people believe they risk nothing by voting Conservative because they are minority, so people vote for them in large numbers and by chance, they will be the majority. "
Secondly, the war in Afghanistan, a subject little discussed in the public arena since the beginning of the campaign. I would, for the pleasure of our eyes, we saw what a mission to build schools and hospitals for Stephen Harper. For every dollar invested in humanitarian aid, $ 5 went into military weaponry, according to Radio-Canada. It's 5 against 1, that is the way to help Afghanistan emerge from the hole, pulling to keep it inside. I can not wait to see spending that this war will cost us collectively. Still weird that 100% of Canadians contribute financially to the war, but only a minority of the population agrees with our presence there.
Then, the environment, that is what the Conservatives will lose their elections. After the withdrawal of Canada's Kyoto Protocol and the objectives of achieving paltry Minister Baird, 2050, we must ask questions to different political parties and especially the Conservatives. Did you feel it's far enough to say "We do not care about the environment, 2050 they will get better with that. "And both just close enough to go for people who care about the planet? Especially when we know the means taken now can ensure that we achieve the Kyoto target in less than 5 years! If, for example, we take the 1% GST removed recently and that we put into a fund for the environment that would be used to purchase trees at more than 24 billion trees could be planted as 1% of the GST is 6 billion. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions and planting trees this is one of real solutions.
short, the preceding examples of the Conservative party clearly demonstrate the inability of the party to run a country for something as pressing as the environment. The war in Afghanistan is too costly militarily and humanely. Not to mention that Harper wants to regain the minority when it already is. I therefore urge people not to vote Conservative on October 14 because of the inaction, irresponsibility and inability to lead correctly Stephen Harper our great nation, Canada.
Claude Côté, 19, Alma, Quebec
0 comments:
Post a Comment